Skip to main content

About your Search

20121117
20121117
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5 (some duplicates have been removed)
it is a lot hotter when you're on the ground there. >> and a lot more technologically sophisticated than the last time we saw things escalating. hamas has rockets landing right outside of tel aviv in jerusalem. what would israel have to do to stop the rockets and does that mean an escalation to a ground offensive? >> i think the weapons, i think the technology as you mentioned, i think that does change the equation to a great extent so the things that israel is going to have to do probably have to be a little more invasive and i don't even ground invasion but more invasive as they go after this kind of capability. it may mean they go in on the ground but it remains to be seen. it does change the equation when rockets can come close to tel aviv and jerusalem. >> how much more prepared how much more powerful is hamas than they were four years ago when we we want through this? >> seem to rearm well. they were beat down bad in 2009 but because of what's happened in libya examine some of the arms they had that migrated now to gaza from iran they seem to be much better pre
lose $20 billion at least per year when there are power outages. we have technology that's built on a 19th century platform. and we didn't get to be one of the most advanced countries in the world by thinking small. we need to bring the othos that we brought to the highway system and commit money over decades to getting this fixed. tracy is absolutely right. >> i don't know, john. should we put this in a new energy policy? >> there is no doubt about it. we have no energy policy, so we don't know how things like a carbon into what we're trying to do. we have no long-term grid policy. what christian is saying is correct. ask a politician what's the grid going to look like when it's 2050? they have zero ideas. so when we have things, we patch things back together. we have got to fix this grid and we've got it get to a smart grid with a dc -- >> you want to do all this because of one storm? >> you have the audacity so call this an inconvenience! the people in staten island and long island are so beyond inconvenience! you can not keep kick the can down the road because it's going to c
be a light footprint with technological containment of the problem. when i hear $3.3 trillion, i hear the bulk of it is because of what happened on 9/11. my question is, in the new normal, what is the role for militant extremism? is it releasing them from jail and giving them a space and controlling them technologically? thank you. >> i will star with the last. if you think the light footprint strategy is all about containment, then it does raise the question of what are the limits of light footprint? what have we discovered it does not do terribly well? it does not build justice or build the kind of global development that paula was discussing before. it deliberately pulls the united states back from a kind of the engagement that we thought in the post-cold war world that we were heading into. and frankly, you might of thought we were heading into it just listening to president obama during the 2008 campaign when he talked mostly about engagement strategy. we did not hear a lot of discussion about what we have all been talking about here today. i think the fact that we have seen the
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5 (some duplicates have been removed)